A little bird tells me that Eureka Miniatures have permission from Michael Moorcock to do a "Hawkmoon" figures range.
I have seen some test shot casts and a few of the upcoming character greens.
They seem very exciting, representing so far Granbretanian troops - Soldiers of the Wolf, Vulture and Badger Orders as well as Flana Mikosevaar.
As I understand it there are plans to release others of the various orders, many of the main characters (yes, I've seen a green of Dorian Hawkmoon, and he's fantastic) and - wait for it - ornithopters!
The Kamargian Guardians will be there with both the giant Flamingo and horned Horse mounts. It's all there, people!
The sculpting style looks very much like "80s Citadel Homage", but with really nice movement through the figure. Certainly these will not be the rather two-dimensional figures of the old "Eternal Champion" range Citadel originally put out.
Very exciting times. I will put up some pictures of the samples I have, both plain inked and later on (when I've had the time) painted.
A Blog dedicated to the creation of my Seven Years' War Army in miniature. Among other things!
Wednesday, January 30, 2013
Tuesday, January 22, 2013
Doodling
Trying to break the painting doldrums in a creative way, I put together and painted this Houston le Creusot "Long Tom" I bought a while back from TVAG.
I thought it might make a nice piece for the Saxon Siege Train as much as for the Boers, so I built a platform for it, although I do not think I will attach the gun to it as I'd like to display it "on the move" as it were.
Gray seemed a reasonable compromise colour to paint the carriage, so off I went!
I thought it might make a nice piece for the Saxon Siege Train as much as for the Boers, so I built a platform for it, although I do not think I will attach the gun to it as I'd like to display it "on the move" as it were.
Gray seemed a reasonable compromise colour to paint the carriage, so off I went!
Monday, January 21, 2013
Painting Doldrums
Oh, they come around once, twice, maybe thrice a year. You know them, and so do I. The dreaded painting doldrums.
Can't be bothered. feel too lazy to put the effort in. Current painting is a chore rather than something you're reluctant to be seperated from.
Sigh.
Time to break out the standard cureswhich are:
1. Take some time off painting. Read a book. Play with the kids. Get some more sleep.
1.1 Read something to re-invigorate your desire to paint.
2. Paint something you want to paint. At the moment, I am grinding away at a unit of Bengal Lancers for the big CanCon event next weekend. It will be a tight finish and I am not enjoying the miniatures. I think I need to paint something for myself.
Enough complaining - I now return you to your regular programming.
Can't be bothered. feel too lazy to put the effort in. Current painting is a chore rather than something you're reluctant to be seperated from.
Sigh.
Time to break out the standard cureswhich are:
1. Take some time off painting. Read a book. Play with the kids. Get some more sleep.
1.1 Read something to re-invigorate your desire to paint.
2. Paint something you want to paint. At the moment, I am grinding away at a unit of Bengal Lancers for the big CanCon event next weekend. It will be a tight finish and I am not enjoying the miniatures. I think I need to paint something for myself.
Enough complaining - I now return you to your regular programming.
Thursday, January 17, 2013
Breaking Free
I was interested to read Jon Sutherlands article in Battlegames #32. Whilst the whole was more about unit activation with initiative cards, it was the first few paragraps of the article that really caught my attention.
He describes a game where in addition to the main action, there are a lot os little tables scattered about the periphery. These contain goodies of the nature of marching columns of troops and various operational objectives - bridges, supply dumps, rear base areas and whatnot.
These are all marked down on a master map.
If flank movements are needed, extra tables are added to facilitate this. As the action ebbs and flows on the main table, other empty tables may be brought in to make that happen too. Indeed, as the action moves forward, the original table may be broken up and moved forward. Those march columns? As they come off their tables onto the main one, their original tables may be recycled.
Every table may be mobile throughout the course of the game.
The obvious benefit of this is that there are no table edges anymore, the toe-to-toe slugfest is gone and maneuver becomes possible.
I know of some who've tried something along these lines - I think Jim and Bill's games often use a "back table" for reserves, the gap between it and the main table does not exist in the reality of the game. I have always been happy to condsider small seperate tables in the Khartoum game to allow the representation of Fort omdurman across the other side of the river. Of course, I've alweays been rather enamoured of the notion of little steamers on tea trolleys chugging their way up the gap between the tables. But these notions are a little static.
The obvious downsides are the amount of physical space and terrain that might be needed, to say nothing of the number of tables!
Still, it seems worth exploring to me in the context at least of the convention game where floor space and table numbers are not so much of a problem.
He describes a game where in addition to the main action, there are a lot os little tables scattered about the periphery. These contain goodies of the nature of marching columns of troops and various operational objectives - bridges, supply dumps, rear base areas and whatnot.
These are all marked down on a master map.
If flank movements are needed, extra tables are added to facilitate this. As the action ebbs and flows on the main table, other empty tables may be brought in to make that happen too. Indeed, as the action moves forward, the original table may be broken up and moved forward. Those march columns? As they come off their tables onto the main one, their original tables may be recycled.
Every table may be mobile throughout the course of the game.
The obvious benefit of this is that there are no table edges anymore, the toe-to-toe slugfest is gone and maneuver becomes possible.
I know of some who've tried something along these lines - I think Jim and Bill's games often use a "back table" for reserves, the gap between it and the main table does not exist in the reality of the game. I have always been happy to condsider small seperate tables in the Khartoum game to allow the representation of Fort omdurman across the other side of the river. Of course, I've alweays been rather enamoured of the notion of little steamers on tea trolleys chugging their way up the gap between the tables. But these notions are a little static.
The obvious downsides are the amount of physical space and terrain that might be needed, to say nothing of the number of tables!
Still, it seems worth exploring to me in the context at least of the convention game where floor space and table numbers are not so much of a problem.
Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Fin de Siecle Alzheim
Some of you may have noticed a new page on this blog over the past couple of days called "Fin de Siecle Alzheim". I wrote it primarily because I want to collect some more of the Spencer Smith "Classic" Franco-Prussian war figures and I needed a framework (and some limits) for my spending. I also wanted to explore what might have happened to Alzheim in the period of the first period of German unification.
Please take the time, if you can spare it, to read what I've put together, it's probably going to occupy about a third of my modelling time this year, so you're going to see rather a lot of of it! I'm open to any and all suggestions, comments and criticisms.
Rules? Keep 'em simple. I'm reading Ross's With McDuff to the Frontier with interest.
Please take the time, if you can spare it, to read what I've put together, it's probably going to occupy about a third of my modelling time this year, so you're going to see rather a lot of of it! I'm open to any and all suggestions, comments and criticisms.
Rules? Keep 'em simple. I'm reading Ross's With McDuff to the Frontier with interest.
Saturday, January 12, 2013
How much is Enough?
| The Artillery |
| The Light Brigade |
| de los Rios leads off |
| Salm Salm Salm to the fore |
| The new boys - awaiting an identity! |
| The Heavy Brigade |
I'm starting to think that it's time to stop building and to start gaming.
OK, I need to base everything consistently, but that's another post.
Tuesday, January 08, 2013
Terrain - Mahdist Fort
| One of the 'gun ports' |
| Something of the entrance and the decoration of the building |
Monday, January 07, 2013
Too late for a New Years' Resolution?
Ah well, too bad if it is.
I pledge this year to spend less time in front of the PC. Indeed, I pledge to spend less time gazing into screens of all shapes and sizes.
I pledge to spend less on eBay!!!
I will read less, but digest more of what I do read.
I will paint less and play more games. Solo if need be.
I will fritter my efforts away to a far lesser extent. No promises, but I'll limit my efforts to three main projects this year and three minor ones.
To wit:
As for the Ancients, although it's been all Macedonians so far, some hoplites have crept onto the painting table and I'm starting to toy with Marathon as an interim goal whilst keeping an eye on the Pelopponesian Wars in the longer term. I have a feeling Kagan's History might be on the birthday list. I just read his short volume of Historiography on Thucydides and was pretty well blown away by his brevity and clarity.
Keeping an eye on the Marathon goal I'm leaning heavily toward the idea of buying 2nd-hand pre-painted minis as a way of speeding the process along. So if anyone is thinking of moving their collections on, drop me a line.
And for the minor projects:
Me and another fellow are looking at doing a Dambusters game this year. Quite acheiveable, I think. We have plenty of research material and are thinking of basing the game on an old WW2 boardgame - don't ask me which, I can't remember just now! More after we next meet over the Australia day long weekend to thrash it out. Short version is 2 waves of three Airfix Lancasters assail the dam attacked by three pair of Me 109s, Me110s and Ju88s. Pretty acheivable as a game I think.
I was pretty fond of my Spencer Smith FPW French and would like to add to them. Perhaps some Bavarians too. Just a brigade of each. They could fill in for all sorts of Ruritanias and I expect the Bavarians would do as Alzheimers whilst the Wurrtemburgers or Prussians might do for Mirenburgers. One just needs a troop of cavalry and a battery of galloping guns in support. What a fine little war game one might then have!
I am bravely resisting Spencer Smiths "Little Britons" 42mm (oh, maybe just a couple of dozen) or getting into the Boer War with Willie 30mm (oh, just a few then): wish me luck with that.
Oh, and I need to lose 8-10 kilos.
I pledge this year to spend less time in front of the PC. Indeed, I pledge to spend less time gazing into screens of all shapes and sizes.
I pledge to spend less on eBay!!!
I will read less, but digest more of what I do read.
I will paint less and play more games. Solo if need be.
I will fritter my efforts away to a far lesser extent. No promises, but I'll limit my efforts to three main projects this year and three minor ones.
To wit:
- The Sudan
- Ancients
- The Duchy of Alzheim
As for the Ancients, although it's been all Macedonians so far, some hoplites have crept onto the painting table and I'm starting to toy with Marathon as an interim goal whilst keeping an eye on the Pelopponesian Wars in the longer term. I have a feeling Kagan's History might be on the birthday list. I just read his short volume of Historiography on Thucydides and was pretty well blown away by his brevity and clarity.
Keeping an eye on the Marathon goal I'm leaning heavily toward the idea of buying 2nd-hand pre-painted minis as a way of speeding the process along. So if anyone is thinking of moving their collections on, drop me a line.
And for the minor projects:
- WW2 Italians
- Not Quite the Dambusters
- FPW?
Me and another fellow are looking at doing a Dambusters game this year. Quite acheiveable, I think. We have plenty of research material and are thinking of basing the game on an old WW2 boardgame - don't ask me which, I can't remember just now! More after we next meet over the Australia day long weekend to thrash it out. Short version is 2 waves of three Airfix Lancasters assail the dam attacked by three pair of Me 109s, Me110s and Ju88s. Pretty acheivable as a game I think.
I was pretty fond of my Spencer Smith FPW French and would like to add to them. Perhaps some Bavarians too. Just a brigade of each. They could fill in for all sorts of Ruritanias and I expect the Bavarians would do as Alzheimers whilst the Wurrtemburgers or Prussians might do for Mirenburgers. One just needs a troop of cavalry and a battery of galloping guns in support. What a fine little war game one might then have!
I am bravely resisting Spencer Smiths "Little Britons" 42mm (oh, maybe just a couple of dozen) or getting into the Boer War with Willie 30mm (oh, just a few then): wish me luck with that.
Oh, and I need to lose 8-10 kilos.
Monday, December 31, 2012
New Years' Eve
And here we are, the end of another year.
Shall we look back and forward?
Strangely, and despite the heroic amounts of painting I have managed over the past year, I still find myself curiously in much the same place!
January - There was a big boom in Spencer Smith painting.
February - Stokes and I began the refight of Sittangbad and I had a bit of a fiddle-faddle about with the Franco-Prussian War. I did manage to paint up some British infantry as French for the big "55 Days at Peking" game.
March - A little terrain making - a marsh and a collection of ponds.
April - A Painting Challenge sort of completed and a sudden interest in Little Wars poked it's head up unexpectedly. Amy made me a very nice infantry flag for my FPW French.
May - Spencer Smith Normans? Duly purchased, painted and put away. Crusades itch scratched - for now. The 1565 project gives one last spastic kick in the form of a large Ravelin.
June - The smaller test-run of the "55 Days" game in Canberra. A smashing success.
July - My shameful failure to paint more Spencer Smith miniatures for a painting Challenge and instead producing a nice little force of Mirliton Italians, a few DAK and some unaccountable Myceneans.
August - The opera bouffe of Bergonzoli's caravan. If you don't remember, well, shame on you. Well-hung libyans and Italian Heavy Artillery, too!
September - Back to the Sudan. Many Egyptians painted, the Glen Moray on the stocks, Hussars, Highlanders. Single Malt. Will it last?
October - Allahu ackbar! Mahdists! Scores of 'em!!
November - Sudan Terrain, Gordon on his last legs... What's that? I have to construct four small and one large building complex by when? OK! And while i'm at it - ancients!
December - Hey, look at these Macedonians!
I managed to get the buildings done and handed them over you'll be relieved to note.
Looking forward then.
Now the demands of terrain building are off me, I can return to the Sudan. Still going strong there and the next 20 Mahdists have been clipped from the frame. if we are going to demo a Sudan game next year, I'll continue to build heaps of them, otherwise I will taper off in March and concentrate on my own campaign.
There you go, a sort of pledge for next year.
Another - The Alzheim and Imperial armies are now at very fightable strengths in terms of the "Grantian" sized armies I had envisaged. I will be fighting battles with them next year. I will. Just a touch of basing to be done and we ought to be right to go.
I want to keep on with my WW2 Italians. Before I go to much further, i either need to find someone locally who'll provide an opponent or build British forces of my own to solo against.
That ought to keep me.
Happy New Year!
Shall we look back and forward?
Strangely, and despite the heroic amounts of painting I have managed over the past year, I still find myself curiously in much the same place!
January - There was a big boom in Spencer Smith painting.
February - Stokes and I began the refight of Sittangbad and I had a bit of a fiddle-faddle about with the Franco-Prussian War. I did manage to paint up some British infantry as French for the big "55 Days at Peking" game.
March - A little terrain making - a marsh and a collection of ponds.
April - A Painting Challenge sort of completed and a sudden interest in Little Wars poked it's head up unexpectedly. Amy made me a very nice infantry flag for my FPW French.
May - Spencer Smith Normans? Duly purchased, painted and put away. Crusades itch scratched - for now. The 1565 project gives one last spastic kick in the form of a large Ravelin.
June - The smaller test-run of the "55 Days" game in Canberra. A smashing success.
July - My shameful failure to paint more Spencer Smith miniatures for a painting Challenge and instead producing a nice little force of Mirliton Italians, a few DAK and some unaccountable Myceneans.
August - The opera bouffe of Bergonzoli's caravan. If you don't remember, well, shame on you. Well-hung libyans and Italian Heavy Artillery, too!
September - Back to the Sudan. Many Egyptians painted, the Glen Moray on the stocks, Hussars, Highlanders. Single Malt. Will it last?
October - Allahu ackbar! Mahdists! Scores of 'em!!
November - Sudan Terrain, Gordon on his last legs... What's that? I have to construct four small and one large building complex by when? OK! And while i'm at it - ancients!
December - Hey, look at these Macedonians!
I managed to get the buildings done and handed them over you'll be relieved to note.
Looking forward then.
Now the demands of terrain building are off me, I can return to the Sudan. Still going strong there and the next 20 Mahdists have been clipped from the frame. if we are going to demo a Sudan game next year, I'll continue to build heaps of them, otherwise I will taper off in March and concentrate on my own campaign.
There you go, a sort of pledge for next year.
Another - The Alzheim and Imperial armies are now at very fightable strengths in terms of the "Grantian" sized armies I had envisaged. I will be fighting battles with them next year. I will. Just a touch of basing to be done and we ought to be right to go.
I want to keep on with my WW2 Italians. Before I go to much further, i either need to find someone locally who'll provide an opponent or build British forces of my own to solo against.
That ought to keep me.
Happy New Year!
Saturday, December 01, 2012
From the Back of the Cupboard
Almost literally true in this case.
Ii was having a clean-up today and re-discovered 60-off painted Eureka Macedonian Phalanx which I purchased and painted in a mad frenzy of enthusiasm when they first became available. Then I carefully read Arrian and decided Alexander was not really to my taste after all and that I didn't really like the figures and... well... just abandoned them.
Of course, now I think they'll go splendidly with a Successor army and am relieved I never eBayed them off. They are closer to true 25s which fits well my current concept for an ancients army, are not too badly painted and just need to be dusted and based.
I also found some Elite Republican Romans. Now I'm thinking of Pydna. Or Pyrrhus* of Epirus. Naturally I'll have to replace the Elites with Mirliton as they'll scale better together.
See how my mind works?
*Now, there was a man who lacked focus!
Ii was having a clean-up today and re-discovered 60-off painted Eureka Macedonian Phalanx which I purchased and painted in a mad frenzy of enthusiasm when they first became available. Then I carefully read Arrian and decided Alexander was not really to my taste after all and that I didn't really like the figures and... well... just abandoned them.
Of course, now I think they'll go splendidly with a Successor army and am relieved I never eBayed them off. They are closer to true 25s which fits well my current concept for an ancients army, are not too badly painted and just need to be dusted and based.
I also found some Elite Republican Romans. Now I'm thinking of Pydna. Or Pyrrhus* of Epirus. Naturally I'll have to replace the Elites with Mirliton as they'll scale better together.
See how my mind works?
*Now, there was a man who lacked focus!
Friday, November 23, 2012
Ancients - the Bits that I Like
That could have been more gracefully phrased. Nonetheless - there is stands. The current state of play on my ongoing struggle with wargaming butterflies:
I'm still really like the look of the various Garrison ranges. Looking around on Ross's blog it seems to me that they are all broadly compatible. With one eye closed and with a following wind. Garrison service (ie, delivery time, unexpected extras, friendly comms and so on) is very good indeed. I note that the 20mm Ancient Phrygians I have are actually about 23-4mm to the eye, yet they still seem not out of place next to the 30mm (nominally) Rose "Heritage" Greeks that I now have 24 of.
I could easily go down the Greeks/Achaemenid Persian/Macedonian road.
I also rather like the RAFM Hellenistic ranges. There is also plenty you could pull in from the Ral Partha range. Quite pricey at $2.50 per figure, but there are bargains to be had on eBay. I would put the Macedonian/Successor period as my number one preference at the moment as you can pull in so much other cool stuff. Again, the Garrison Successors are cool with plenty of variety.
I've been having a seried of "ooo, pretty" moments this week at the Mirliton website. Especially after noting you can get 10% off your order if you buy 100 figures. Their Republican Romans, Etruscans , Apulians and others are very, very attractive. Especially after just reading in Charles Grants Ancient Scenarios book that he thought you could do a reasonable job at a legion with 60 figures.
Did I mention also the stash of Xyston1:600 galleys I found in my desk drawer a couple of days back> Probably not. And that's another tangent in itself.
The trick is how to do all these things (and, let's face it, buy at least 1500 wargames figures. At least.) and somehow tie them altogether.
I'm still really like the look of the various Garrison ranges. Looking around on Ross's blog it seems to me that they are all broadly compatible. With one eye closed and with a following wind. Garrison service (ie, delivery time, unexpected extras, friendly comms and so on) is very good indeed. I note that the 20mm Ancient Phrygians I have are actually about 23-4mm to the eye, yet they still seem not out of place next to the 30mm (nominally) Rose "Heritage" Greeks that I now have 24 of.
I could easily go down the Greeks/Achaemenid Persian/Macedonian road.
I also rather like the RAFM Hellenistic ranges. There is also plenty you could pull in from the Ral Partha range. Quite pricey at $2.50 per figure, but there are bargains to be had on eBay. I would put the Macedonian/Successor period as my number one preference at the moment as you can pull in so much other cool stuff. Again, the Garrison Successors are cool with plenty of variety.
I've been having a seried of "ooo, pretty" moments this week at the Mirliton website. Especially after noting you can get 10% off your order if you buy 100 figures. Their Republican Romans, Etruscans , Apulians and others are very, very attractive. Especially after just reading in Charles Grants Ancient Scenarios book that he thought you could do a reasonable job at a legion with 60 figures.
Did I mention also the stash of Xyston1:600 galleys I found in my desk drawer a couple of days back> Probably not. And that's another tangent in itself.
The trick is how to do all these things (and, let's face it, buy at least 1500 wargames figures. At least.) and somehow tie them altogether.
Thursday, November 15, 2012
Desert Island Blogs
Imagine...
A hot dry wind blows...
A post-apocalyptic wasteland...
All the whiskey is gone and the beer and wine are running low...
Cheesy biscuits are in short supply...
Your laptop battery has been saying 15% for the past 2 months now, however long you have it on charge...
All the blogs in the world have been wiped out...
Excepting the half a dozen you managed to save...
I'm thinking:
http://gatheringofhosts.blogspot.com.au/
http://parumpugna.blogspot.com.au/
http://vintagewargaming.blogspot.com.au/
http://unfashionablyshiny.blogspot.com.au/
http://steve-the-wargamer-teasers.blogspot.com.au/
and
http://flanderkin.blogspot.com.au/
If only Google Chrome would stop eating Mr P's posts.
Says more about where my fickle head is at rather than the absence of anyone on the list. Stokes, I am looking directly at you! Stop daydreaming about that pair of brogues you're peeping at on eBay.
A hot dry wind blows...
A post-apocalyptic wasteland...
All the whiskey is gone and the beer and wine are running low...
Cheesy biscuits are in short supply...
Your laptop battery has been saying 15% for the past 2 months now, however long you have it on charge...
All the blogs in the world have been wiped out...
Excepting the half a dozen you managed to save...
I'm thinking:
http://gatheringofhosts.blogspot.com.au/
http://parumpugna.blogspot.com.au/
http://vintagewargaming.blogspot.com.au/
http://unfashionablyshiny.blogspot.com.au/
http://steve-the-wargamer-teasers.blogspot.com.au/
and
http://flanderkin.blogspot.com.au/
If only Google Chrome would stop eating Mr P's posts.
Says more about where my fickle head is at rather than the absence of anyone on the list. Stokes, I am looking directly at you! Stop daydreaming about that pair of brogues you're peeping at on eBay.
Wednesday, November 14, 2012
When butterflies attack
I should stay away from the internet.
This:
http://gatheringofhosts.blogspot.com.au/
plus this:
http://parumpugna.blogspot.com.au/
Equals this:
http://www.garrisonminiatures.com/
and:
http://www.rafm.com/
Hopefully this will serve as a small butterfly smackdown kind of arrangement.
This:
http://gatheringofhosts.blogspot.com.au/
plus this:
http://parumpugna.blogspot.com.au/
Equals this:
http://www.garrisonminiatures.com/
and:
http://www.rafm.com/
Hopefully this will serve as a small butterfly smackdown kind of arrangement.
Friday, November 09, 2012
Aba Island 1881
The first battle of the Mahdiyyah was fought on Aba Island in 1881.
200 Egyptian troops disembarked from the steamer Ismailiya with an artillery piece in tow early in the morning of 11th August. The two officers in charge had been told that he who took the Muhammed Ahmad would win a promotion. Their two groups of troops formed up then blundered their way inland.
The Mahdi's followers, some 300 Ansar were armed with melee weapons only, yet as they broke upon the Egyptians in the dimness of the dawn, only a dozen fell to the ill-aimed scatter of Remington shots.
One hundred and twenty of the Egyptian troops failed to scramble back aboard the steamer.
Aba Island is a long, thin body, some 14 km long and about one wide, on the White Nile. It lies about 200 km to the South of Khartoum. At the time it was heavily wooded and was indeed a centre of boat-building activity.
That's all I have! Now to turn it into a war-game.
First the rules - the Sword and the Flame will suffice.
Second the Order of Battle.
I think two units of Egyptians (40 figures) and three of Ansar (60) will do.
The terrain will be heavily wooded. There will be a village some way back from the shore. There will be a landing stage. The river banks are very steep - no gently-shelving beach.
200 Egyptian troops disembarked from the steamer Ismailiya with an artillery piece in tow early in the morning of 11th August. The two officers in charge had been told that he who took the Muhammed Ahmad would win a promotion. Their two groups of troops formed up then blundered their way inland.
The Mahdi's followers, some 300 Ansar were armed with melee weapons only, yet as they broke upon the Egyptians in the dimness of the dawn, only a dozen fell to the ill-aimed scatter of Remington shots.
One hundred and twenty of the Egyptian troops failed to scramble back aboard the steamer.
Aba Island is a long, thin body, some 14 km long and about one wide, on the White Nile. It lies about 200 km to the South of Khartoum. At the time it was heavily wooded and was indeed a centre of boat-building activity.
That's all I have! Now to turn it into a war-game.
First the rules - the Sword and the Flame will suffice.
Second the Order of Battle.
I think two units of Egyptians (40 figures) and three of Ansar (60) will do.
The terrain will be heavily wooded. There will be a village some way back from the shore. There will be a landing stage. The river banks are very steep - no gently-shelving beach.
Saturday, November 03, 2012
Painting Challenges in the Soodan
| Another fine mess you got me into Maleesh! |
I decided to kick off with a bang and go for the top with the Willie Chinese Gordon. Clearly drawn from the famous painting and a quick and easy job. I made sure his hair was white as the stress of events has clearly taken it's toll of him.
| Grass roof detail scribed with a fork into gap filler. |
| Onward! Peter Gilder made me! |
| Not Charlton Heston. |
| Jihadiyya Rifles. |
| Ack! Here they come Maleesh! |
| Yet another experiment with basing. I am thinking of using the bigger bases
to hold 7-8 figures (representing 10) with a mounted leader and
bannerman on every third - a unit would be three bases with a scattering
of singles for the look of it. This layout above is 25 figures plus one
mounted representing 30. Looks good to my eye, but now I need to make it work
against singly mounted opponents for Fire and Melee purposes in a
convention setting! Current painting challenge total - 38 figures and three buildings. |
Saturday, October 13, 2012
Castaway Arts Mahdists
I painted up a dozen Castaway Arts Mahdists last night and this morning using the same techniques as with the Perry ones in my previous post.
These are some of the earliest figures in the range, and I have come to really appreciate how well-researched they are. If anything they were easier to paint than the Perrys - although that may be because I now have the style of painting worked out... certainly they were easier to stick together!
These are some of the earliest figures in the range, and I have come to really appreciate how well-researched they are. If anything they were easier to paint than the Perrys - although that may be because I now have the style of painting worked out... certainly they were easier to stick together!
Tuesday, October 09, 2012
Perry Mahdists
![]() |
| The Mahdi wants you! |
These are pretty nice miniatures that assemble quite easily. A little careful positioning and most of the joins where the plastic arms meet the plastic shoulders, especially if you let a little of the glue squidge out to act as filler.
Opening the box it's apparrent that they have tried to do quite a lot with the miniatures. They are trying to give you the option of early and later Beja, Kordofani and Nile Arabs and even the early Ansar. In my opinion they have tried to cover a few too many bases with the one set. However, you can do worse than build them up as as your Kordofani Rebels or Nile Arabs. Perhaps as early Beja, although to my eye, some of them will be a little too well-dressed as the latter.
That being said, they suit my purposes admirably and will be please to field a horde of 2-300 of them. They respond well to my speed painting. This involves being undercoated with a can of the Army Painter Skeleton Bone coloured rattle-can paint. I then damp-brush highlight this up to some thing approaching white, not being at all careful with the brush. Then I wash the flesh areas with a mix of heavily watered yellow-brown that I call "Arab Skin". Spearchafts and rifles get a thinnish coat of yellow ochre. When all that's dry, everything (and I mean everything) gets a wash of gryphonne sepia. Then the metal bits get a coat of black, then blades get a quick wipe with boltgun metal.
Persnickety details get done, mostly in brown and brass. Then with a fairly dry brush, I go over the lot and brighten up some of the whites.
Gloss varnish and the job's a good 'un.
Sunday, September 30, 2012
Egyptians
Today (instead of actually having a game - rolls eyes!) I thought I might take the time to see how much table (or floor) space a TSaTF battalion might take up.
This is four units, each of 20 figures. Artillery outside the square with a few skirmishers out to screen the crews.
The ruler is scaled in centimetres.
The bases of pack animals gives an idea of the effect I want to acheive.
Now I just need to fix the basing up!
Additionally, I've re-read my Snook and gleaned the following figures for the Khartoum
Garrison:
As of the 22nd of November, Gordon had the following troops in the garrison:
1421 Egyptian Regulars
2316 Sudanese regulars
1906 Bashi Buzuks
2330 Sha'iq'a Irregulars
692 Armed Citizens
Additionally, there were 12 guns on the lines, another 11 in the steamers as
well as 2 Krupp 20-pounders. Gordon states in his journals he had 2-3 "French
Mitrailleuses".
To that date also, Gordon notes the garrison has suffered 1800-1900 fatal
casualties. 800 of those are from the Sudanese troops. At the start of the seige
then, the garrison of Khartoum is in the region of about 10,500 men.
Note that most of the Egyptians are either at Fort Omdurman or on the steamers.
As to breaking them down for wargaming purposes, I've chosen a scale of 40:1 and
distributed the remaining 1,100 casualties roughly proportionately, thus:
40 Egyptian Regulars
80 Sudanese regulars
60 Bashi Buzuks
60 Sha'iq'a Irregulars
20 Armed Citizens
I need to check a little firther to see what proportion of the Bashi Buzuks may
have been mounted, if only to see how far their mounts might be used to eke out
the food supply...
This gives us a total of 260 figures which, if you multiply it back out, comes
to 10,400. So not too bad an approximation of the garrison.
At the same ratio, we'd need to find a maximum of 1200 Mahdists (equating to
50,000 of the Mahdi's army) at their peak strength. This number might be
expected to reduce as fort garrisons are detatched.
Any thoughts or comments?
This is four units, each of 20 figures. Artillery outside the square with a few skirmishers out to screen the crews.
The ruler is scaled in centimetres.
The bases of pack animals gives an idea of the effect I want to acheive.
Now I just need to fix the basing up!
Additionally, I've re-read my Snook and gleaned the following figures for the Khartoum
Garrison:
As of the 22nd of November, Gordon had the following troops in the garrison:
1421 Egyptian Regulars
2316 Sudanese regulars
1906 Bashi Buzuks
2330 Sha'iq'a Irregulars
692 Armed Citizens
Additionally, there were 12 guns on the lines, another 11 in the steamers as
well as 2 Krupp 20-pounders. Gordon states in his journals he had 2-3 "French
Mitrailleuses".
To that date also, Gordon notes the garrison has suffered 1800-1900 fatal
casualties. 800 of those are from the Sudanese troops. At the start of the seige
then, the garrison of Khartoum is in the region of about 10,500 men.
Note that most of the Egyptians are either at Fort Omdurman or on the steamers.
As to breaking them down for wargaming purposes, I've chosen a scale of 40:1 and
distributed the remaining 1,100 casualties roughly proportionately, thus:
40 Egyptian Regulars
80 Sudanese regulars
60 Bashi Buzuks
60 Sha'iq'a Irregulars
20 Armed Citizens
I need to check a little firther to see what proportion of the Bashi Buzuks may
have been mounted, if only to see how far their mounts might be used to eke out
the food supply...
This gives us a total of 260 figures which, if you multiply it back out, comes
to 10,400. So not too bad an approximation of the garrison.
At the same ratio, we'd need to find a maximum of 1200 Mahdists (equating to
50,000 of the Mahdi's army) at their peak strength. This number might be
expected to reduce as fort garrisons are detatched.
Any thoughts or comments?
Thursday, September 27, 2012
Plans, plans, plans
It's been more or less decided. We are heading off for the Soodan.
I am am member of a loose group of gamers and megalomaniacs who get together twice a year at CanCon and now WinterCon to put on a massive wargame of one sort or another.
We did a large 55 Days game at WinterCon this year and will follow up with it's big brother at CanCon over the Australia Day long weekend.
Next year's CanCon will be set in the Sudan and it looks (not to put too fine a point on it) MASSIVE.
Ideas being kicked around are a three-days' long campaign involving:
The River Column
The Desert Column
The Seige of Khartoum
or
All three!
At the moment, all's to play for but my money's on the "all three" option.
So the preliminary work involves looking at the historical orbats and then juggling figure numbers to get appropriate unit sizes - if you want bit briish Units, you need 4-8 times as many Mahdists and we are wanting 200 or more British and a similar number of Egyptians in Khartoum! 1500 or more Mahdists might do it. Even with some Gilderesque tricks, that's still a formidable number of troops. Oddly though, if enough of us pitch in, our existing collections will take us most of the way there (especially for the British) and well, there are always the Perry Mahdists in plastic...
Then there is the planning. How are we going to put on the game? What sort of game will it be? For myself, I'd like to see a co-operative game with the players all on the one side (which one :^)) with the Mahdists either run by the Umpire or (another Gilder touch) some species of reaction table. Then there are the rules - probably home-baked and based on the 55 Days ruleset we've written. And the terrain...
Where's MS Project when you need it?
I am am member of a loose group of gamers and megalomaniacs who get together twice a year at CanCon and now WinterCon to put on a massive wargame of one sort or another.
We did a large 55 Days game at WinterCon this year and will follow up with it's big brother at CanCon over the Australia Day long weekend.
Next year's CanCon will be set in the Sudan and it looks (not to put too fine a point on it) MASSIVE.
Ideas being kicked around are a three-days' long campaign involving:
The River Column
The Desert Column
The Seige of Khartoum
or
All three!
At the moment, all's to play for but my money's on the "all three" option.
So the preliminary work involves looking at the historical orbats and then juggling figure numbers to get appropriate unit sizes - if you want bit briish Units, you need 4-8 times as many Mahdists and we are wanting 200 or more British and a similar number of Egyptians in Khartoum! 1500 or more Mahdists might do it. Even with some Gilderesque tricks, that's still a formidable number of troops. Oddly though, if enough of us pitch in, our existing collections will take us most of the way there (especially for the British) and well, there are always the Perry Mahdists in plastic...
Then there is the planning. How are we going to put on the game? What sort of game will it be? For myself, I'd like to see a co-operative game with the players all on the one side (which one :^)) with the Mahdists either run by the Umpire or (another Gilder touch) some species of reaction table. Then there are the rules - probably home-baked and based on the 55 Days ruleset we've written. And the terrain...
Where's MS Project when you need it?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
