A Blog dedicated to the creation of my Seven Years' War Army in miniature. Among other things!
Friday, July 01, 2016
Thursday, June 30, 2016
Project for 2016-2017
More important politically than militarily, the Battle ofFehrbellin (June 18, 1675) will be the focus of a new project here in the Duchy
of Alzheim.
![]() |
| Pinched from Wikipedia |
I have admired for quite a while the Willie late 17th
Century figures (Monmouths’ Rebellion, Tangier and so on…) and had been looking
for an excuse to paint some up. This will be the excuse!
Pitting a well-balanced Swedish force which is attempting an
orderly withdrawal under pressure against a Brandenburg army which is mostly
cavalry, it is an interesting battle between two small armies of differing
capabilities.
The Brandenburg army was somewhere in the region of 30
Squadrons of horse, slightly more than a regiment of Dragoons, 1350 infantry
drawn from various regiments and 14 guns. The Swedes disposed of a similarly
sized force but with a better balance between infantry and cavalry as well as a
marked superiority in artillery. I do not have a precise breakdown of the
Swedish force so I shall guesstimate somewhere in the region of twenty
squadrons and about 2400 infantry along with 25 guns.
I will be using the Beneath the Lily Banner (2nd Ed) rules
which seem pretty well right for the fight. For those of you who are not
familiar with them, in BtLB2 an infantry unit is three stands of six figures.
Another smaller stand of pike may be added
(decoratively and as a designator) behind the central stand for nations
other than the Swedes. For the Swedes, the Pike are considered to be a part of
the central stand. A squadron of horse is represented by a single stand of 2-3
figures.
What does this mean for me? If I went for a representation
of each unit involved, then for the Brandenburgers I would be putting two units
of foot (say the equivalent of two 600+ man battalions) on the table and 30 squadrons
of horse as well as 2-3 guns on the table. The Swedes would get in the region
of 5-6 units of infantry, 25 Squadrons and 5-6 guns. Were I to bathtub things,
I would reduce the numbers of units by half and plan my ground scale
accordingly.
Now, if anyone was able to get me Swedish Uniform and Flag
references as well as a decent Swedish OOB for the battle, I’d have it made!
Pictures as I paint figures will be forthcoming.
Friday, June 03, 2016
Bit of an Idea for a Late 17th Century Regiment of Foot
Consider if you will the following:
N P P P P P N
MMMMMM P D P D P MMMMMM GG
MMMMMM P O E O P MMMMMM GG
N = NCO
M = Musketeer
P = Pikeman
O = Officer
E = Ensign
D = Drummer
G = Grenadier
I'd base the musketeers on 4, six figure bases and the pike block on a single base. The grenadiers would be off on their own ready to be stuck in some Folorn Hope.
N P P P P P N
MMMMMM P D P D P MMMMMM GG
MMMMMM P O E O P MMMMMM GG
N = NCO
M = Musketeer
P = Pikeman
O = Officer
E = Ensign
D = Drummer
G = Grenadier
I'd base the musketeers on 4, six figure bases and the pike block on a single base. The grenadiers would be off on their own ready to be stuck in some Folorn Hope.
Tuesday, May 03, 2016
Heckenfeur - It's on us; real world consequences
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-05-03/green-it's-on-us:-the-real-world-consequences-of-our-politics/7375436
Now, under the Australian asylum seeker regime someone's gone and actually doused himself with petrol. And burned himself to death.
So proud of my country. So very proud.
Normal service will be resumed shortly.
Now, under the Australian asylum seeker regime someone's gone and actually doused himself with petrol. And burned himself to death.
So proud of my country. So very proud.
Normal service will be resumed shortly.
Wednesday, April 20, 2016
Wither Wargaming?
Some news.
There is a bit of a building project afoot at chez moi.
The end result will be along the lines of a three metre by six metre studio-cum-man-cave for yours truly.
I am reasonably secure in the knowlege that this will only take a minimum of pruning (especially of books and plastic kits of various kinds!) and I ought to then be shoe-horned into a reasonable space with everything in the one place. I have dreams of a reading chair, a lamp and a kettle.
Until now, the greatest barrier to my fully exploiting the possibilities of the hobby has been the lack of a place where I might actually have a game or leave one set up for a few days, so, the fingers are crossed.
Now I might actually have to have some sort of a game with all these toy soldier thingies I keep on buying!
There is a bit of a building project afoot at chez moi.
The end result will be along the lines of a three metre by six metre studio-cum-man-cave for yours truly.
I am reasonably secure in the knowlege that this will only take a minimum of pruning (especially of books and plastic kits of various kinds!) and I ought to then be shoe-horned into a reasonable space with everything in the one place. I have dreams of a reading chair, a lamp and a kettle.
Until now, the greatest barrier to my fully exploiting the possibilities of the hobby has been the lack of a place where I might actually have a game or leave one set up for a few days, so, the fingers are crossed.
Now I might actually have to have some sort of a game with all these toy soldier thingies I keep on buying!
Monday, March 07, 2016
Da Wallz Uv Mektown
What's a GorkaMorka game without some big, orky-looking terrain?
A chum and I are preparing slowly for a GorkaMorka demo game at the end of May for Little Wars, Melbourne.
Not to give too much away, but we are looking at getting a tanker Trukk full of XXXX Fungus Beer (Old Toady qv) from Da BrooHaus to Mektown along a rolling track with 2-3 factions attacking to win the prize of bringing 'er 'ome for Da Big Wun; look, let's just say it's one huge Orky Kultcharal Festivul and leave it at dat.
Like Orktoberfest, but wiv more Gunz.
Anyway, here are the fruits of my labours on the weekend with corrugated cardboard, masking tape, gloopy glue, paint, water and plaster powder. The result seems pretty robust and just needs a lick of paint.
Job's a good 'un. But does it need spikes? The question of our age.
UPDATE - Oh what the heck, let me inundate you with Orky imagery.
![]() |
| Da Wallz Uv MekTown |
Not to give too much away, but we are looking at getting a tanker Trukk full of XXXX Fungus Beer (Old Toady qv) from Da BrooHaus to Mektown along a rolling track with 2-3 factions attacking to win the prize of bringing 'er 'ome for Da Big Wun; look, let's just say it's one huge Orky Kultcharal Festivul and leave it at dat.
Like Orktoberfest, but wiv more Gunz.
Anyway, here are the fruits of my labours on the weekend with corrugated cardboard, masking tape, gloopy glue, paint, water and plaster powder. The result seems pretty robust and just needs a lick of paint.
Job's a good 'un. But does it need spikes? The question of our age.
UPDATE - Oh what the heck, let me inundate you with Orky imagery.
![]() |
| A few uv da Boyz. Groink! |
![]() |
| Trukks wiv Boarding Plankz. Raaarrrrrr! |
![]() |
| Trukkz wiv Roll Cagez - an unushual vencha in OH&S for da Ladz |
Tuesday, February 23, 2016
Sunday, February 21, 2016
Foremost Gunners - WiP
Hinchcliffe/Foremost Gunners.
These are rather nice figures and not incompatible with the Bicornes in the last post. Perhaps just a smidge taller. That's mostly due to the height of the bases though. heir anatomy is fairly natural and the sculpting simple, but not to the point of naivety. I do like the combination of smooth surfaces and shrply-incised detail which works well with washes. Likewise, I am very enamoured with the ability to add 7-8 figures to a single gun crew.
Lovely.
These miniatures are currently drying out their intermediate matt varnish coats in this picture. I often apply varnish to miniatures in the middle of the painting process if I think the paintwork will need protecting as the show goes on.
These are rather nice figures and not incompatible with the Bicornes in the last post. Perhaps just a smidge taller. That's mostly due to the height of the bases though. heir anatomy is fairly natural and the sculpting simple, but not to the point of naivety. I do like the combination of smooth surfaces and shrply-incised detail which works well with washes. Likewise, I am very enamoured with the ability to add 7-8 figures to a single gun crew.
Lovely.
These miniatures are currently drying out their intermediate matt varnish coats in this picture. I often apply varnish to miniatures in the middle of the painting process if I think the paintwork will need protecting as the show goes on.
Saturday, February 20, 2016
Help Me; I'm painting Napoleonics!
Well. at the Duchy of Alzheim we are busy packing things up as our renovations seem likely to re-commence next week. This is a good thing as it will render us with a more civilized amount of that unutterable luxury - more living space. In my personal case this will also mean a dedicated hobby space that I have taken to calling a 'shedio' - part shed, part studio and wholly man cave.
However, before this is to happen, current hobby activities need to be reduced to the size of a paining tray again and so I am now just painting - in dribs and drabs - just a few Napoleonics.This isn't really a problem as I am deciding on a few long term projects at the moment and deciding whether I can face painting a few hundred fairly gaudy troops will be a deciding factor. And just to complicate matters a little, I seem unable to choose between Spain and Egypt and so am plumping for both. I also am entertaining a horrible suspicion (based on starting to re-read Marbot) that I may also get stuck with the French and Austrians in italy in the 1790s.
Anyway, that's another kettle of fish and I have hopes of some inter-operability at least among the cavalry and the guns.
Here's today's issue. What's wrong with this picture? I started painting the line infantryman on the left initially thinking he's an elite company bod. Look at that plume! A Voltigeur, surely. Then I noticed he's got no epaulets. Uhh. Ok. A fusilier then. The chamois collar became red. That's right, I thought. But then there is that plume. Did they wear them? I always was under the impression that he ought to have a pom-pom (I'm thinking of the 6-company structure...). His shako is rigged for full dress, though, so perhaps a plume is plausible?
Then there's the officer. Is his plume OK if he's with the light company? Or ought it be white?
This is what Napoleonics do to a man.
The figures themselves are Bicorne and lovely. The officer was very easy to paint, the fusileer less so due to his strapping nature, but we got there in the end. Each took a painting session each to get through. More have been purchased.
Next up are some Formost 30mm Line gunners which look very dishy - technically for 1812 on, but I won't tell if you don't.
However, before this is to happen, current hobby activities need to be reduced to the size of a paining tray again and so I am now just painting - in dribs and drabs - just a few Napoleonics.This isn't really a problem as I am deciding on a few long term projects at the moment and deciding whether I can face painting a few hundred fairly gaudy troops will be a deciding factor. And just to complicate matters a little, I seem unable to choose between Spain and Egypt and so am plumping for both. I also am entertaining a horrible suspicion (based on starting to re-read Marbot) that I may also get stuck with the French and Austrians in italy in the 1790s.
Anyway, that's another kettle of fish and I have hopes of some inter-operability at least among the cavalry and the guns.
Here's today's issue. What's wrong with this picture? I started painting the line infantryman on the left initially thinking he's an elite company bod. Look at that plume! A Voltigeur, surely. Then I noticed he's got no epaulets. Uhh. Ok. A fusilier then. The chamois collar became red. That's right, I thought. But then there is that plume. Did they wear them? I always was under the impression that he ought to have a pom-pom (I'm thinking of the 6-company structure...). His shako is rigged for full dress, though, so perhaps a plume is plausible?
Then there's the officer. Is his plume OK if he's with the light company? Or ought it be white?
This is what Napoleonics do to a man.
The figures themselves are Bicorne and lovely. The officer was very easy to paint, the fusileer less so due to his strapping nature, but we got there in the end. Each took a painting session each to get through. More have been purchased.
Next up are some Formost 30mm Line gunners which look very dishy - technically for 1812 on, but I won't tell if you don't.
Tuesday, December 29, 2015
Why We Fight
A few shots of the climax of the raid on Fickmuhlen.
Much happiness here with regards to the look of the thing.
von Browne's Foot in reserve under the watchful eye of the general himself.
The Dragoons, awaiting their role as spoilers.
The damned, useless guns.
Many, many thanks to Ross and Stokes for helping make this battle possible. Happy New Year to us all.
Much happiness here with regards to the look of the thing.
von Browne's Foot in reserve under the watchful eye of the general himself.
The Dragoons, awaiting their role as spoilers.
The damned, useless guns.
Many, many thanks to Ross and Stokes for helping make this battle possible. Happy New Year to us all.
Wednesday, December 09, 2015
Long Live Borduria!
For some time I have been rather curious as to what went on
in Alzheim in that period between the wars.
And I'll admit, rather inspired by this.
At the same time too I have accumulated a reasonably-sized
force of Slovak troops along with a few Hungarians and Romanians, all from the Raventhorpe
ranges and whom I have been looking to
put to wider employment than they currently have been.
I also have a liking for the old KP kits of 1/72 aircraft,
especially those of the interwar Czechosloval air force.
So I think we can see where this might be leading. I’m
imagining a small conflict between Alzheim and another party in about 1930. The issue would be over the possession of
a small stretch of the border country in order that some group of lost brothers
and sisters be reunited with their brethren across the border as they had been
since time immemorial. This was I believe the fashion of the time.
I’d probably use the Rapid Fire rule set.
Thursday, November 26, 2015
Never Sell Your Toys
For you shall someday want them again.
About three years ago I had a large pile of plastic Spencer Smith ACW Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery.
There was probably enough of everything to build complete armies for the Union and Confederate sides. With sufficient leftovers to do things like staff groups, crews for paddle steamers, fortress gunners, engineers and all that.
Naturally I sold it all off as I had decided to do ACW with my Tradition 25s. At the time a difficult decision as I had really liked the look of John Preece's collection shown in The Wargame Companion and absolutely agonised over the choice.
Now of course I've gone and looked at the pictures again and thought well, you know what, I'd really like to do a few.
Learn from my sad example.
About three years ago I had a large pile of plastic Spencer Smith ACW Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery.
There was probably enough of everything to build complete armies for the Union and Confederate sides. With sufficient leftovers to do things like staff groups, crews for paddle steamers, fortress gunners, engineers and all that.
Naturally I sold it all off as I had decided to do ACW with my Tradition 25s. At the time a difficult decision as I had really liked the look of John Preece's collection shown in The Wargame Companion and absolutely agonised over the choice.
Now of course I've gone and looked at the pictures again and thought well, you know what, I'd really like to do a few.
Learn from my sad example.
Monday, November 16, 2015
Wednesday, October 28, 2015
Experiments with Flats
I've recently been playing around with an idea for a war game inspired by Harry Pearson's article in MW after the change in management.
As you can see, I've been trawling about on German eBay for flats.
I'm not getting too hung up on figure ratios and all that sort of thing. As far as I am concerned, one stand is a squadron, battalion or battery. To my eye about four cavalry look good, as do a dozen infantry or a single gun.
Things are not too far along at the moment; I'm really just playing around with the aesthetics of the thing. That said, I envisage using mini dice to record combat attrition. I also envision using written orders that may be deviated from through the expenditure of initiative tokens. Different armies might have different numbers of them to expend per turn. I would expect the Prussians to have more than the Austrians who, in their turn might have more than the French.
Any feedback would be highly valued.
As you can see, I've been trawling about on German eBay for flats.
I'm not getting too hung up on figure ratios and all that sort of thing. As far as I am concerned, one stand is a squadron, battalion or battery. To my eye about four cavalry look good, as do a dozen infantry or a single gun.
Things are not too far along at the moment; I'm really just playing around with the aesthetics of the thing. That said, I envisage using mini dice to record combat attrition. I also envision using written orders that may be deviated from through the expenditure of initiative tokens. Different armies might have different numbers of them to expend per turn. I would expect the Prussians to have more than the Austrians who, in their turn might have more than the French.
Any feedback would be highly valued.
Thursday, October 22, 2015
Valiant Miniatures Fallschirmjager
I have a deal with my nephew.
I give him figures. He assembles them. I paint them and hand them back.
Here's the latest batch. Rather enjoyable to paint in the old wash and line technique. But I should have painted their chin-straps... And I wish they had more riflemen options and replaced at least some of the MG42s with MG34s
I give him figures. He assembles them. I paint them and hand them back.
Here's the latest batch. Rather enjoyable to paint in the old wash and line technique. But I should have painted their chin-straps... And I wish they had more riflemen options and replaced at least some of the MG42s with MG34s
Sunday, September 06, 2015
A Diversion
Due to some home renovations severely impacting my available hobby space (!) I've consequently downsized my hobby efforts. This state of affairs ought to last until about Christmas.
So, then, i needed something o occupy my hands and mind but which needed to be quite self-contained. I have had a small collection of 54mm knights from the first "Knights of Agincourt" Britains range that have been nicely recast by Dorset Soldiers. These are pretty suitable for painting one at a time out of my small painting tray.
So, of I went and here's the first fruit. Sir John Chandos.
So, then, i needed something o occupy my hands and mind but which needed to be quite self-contained. I have had a small collection of 54mm knights from the first "Knights of Agincourt" Britains range that have been nicely recast by Dorset Soldiers. These are pretty suitable for painting one at a time out of my small painting tray.
So, of I went and here's the first fruit. Sir John Chandos.
Sunday, August 02, 2015
A Glorious Cavacade (and a small Cannonade)
Not all has been connoisseur toy-soldier nobbling and John Garrett reading, oh no, no, no! Here in the Duchy of Alzheim, we believe in the virtues of hard work, buckling down to it and of course, getting on with things. So, in that vein, a small reveal of the fruits of my various labors.
Starting with the freshly-mounted CR#5, you may note that I have splashed out and bought the riders in from another painter with some money I was fortunate to receive for my birthday back in March. Well done Rich from DPC. I am well pleased with his tiny troopers as they sit astride my own horses. I have no fears they will not fight for me as those I myself have painted. My own generalship is far more likely to let me down.
My current butterflies have led me to the 7YW for the now, and thus I am inspired to get on with my Prussian Cavalry arm. Here (along with the Cuirassiers) we have the current state of affairs. HR#1 and HR#5 both provisionally complete but for a single wretched casting I was short for each. Nonetheless, close enough for now.
The artillery has long needed limbers and so I have cranked a couple of out. I am just painting up another team or two to draw them as we speak (so to say) and am waiting on the first wash to dry before i paint their manes and harness.
They do look the part, do they not?
What's next? hard to say. I have a regiment of dragoons who need a bit of a spruce-up before I will be happy t add them to the order of battle and a further half unit of von Kleists dragoons likewise in need of a little tidy up and a small reinforcement. That will bring me to two each of dragoons and Hussars and a single unit of Cuirassiers. I guess one more of Cuirassiers is in order and we might be about done for the Prussians. Although...
Starting with the freshly-mounted CR#5, you may note that I have splashed out and bought the riders in from another painter with some money I was fortunate to receive for my birthday back in March. Well done Rich from DPC. I am well pleased with his tiny troopers as they sit astride my own horses. I have no fears they will not fight for me as those I myself have painted. My own generalship is far more likely to let me down.
My current butterflies have led me to the 7YW for the now, and thus I am inspired to get on with my Prussian Cavalry arm. Here (along with the Cuirassiers) we have the current state of affairs. HR#1 and HR#5 both provisionally complete but for a single wretched casting I was short for each. Nonetheless, close enough for now.
The artillery has long needed limbers and so I have cranked a couple of out. I am just painting up another team or two to draw them as we speak (so to say) and am waiting on the first wash to dry before i paint their manes and harness.
They do look the part, do they not?
What's next? hard to say. I have a regiment of dragoons who need a bit of a spruce-up before I will be happy t add them to the order of battle and a further half unit of von Kleists dragoons likewise in need of a little tidy up and a small reinforcement. That will bring me to two each of dragoons and Hussars and a single unit of Cuirassiers. I guess one more of Cuirassiers is in order and we might be about done for the Prussians. Although...
Monday, July 20, 2015
Alec Harrison
I sometimes think that with two large 18th Century armies, a large Colonial army, various WW2 forces, quite large Ancient armies and so on and so forth if my days of building huge forces of 7-800 figures a side might be drawing to a close. Obviously this is nonsense, but if it were ever to happen (and there is yet time, I am but a mere lad of 47 years) then this is one diversion for my declining years.
I was leafing through my old magazines over the weekend. What better way is there to pass the time these bitter cold winter nights, I ask you? Anyway, in between glasses of Shiraz, I came across these articles featuring the work of one Mr Alec Harrison of the BMSS in the March 1988 issue of Military Modelling and the inestimable Practical Wargamer of January/February 1994
His work is utterly charming in my eyes and has the advantages of using 30mm Willie figures, all converted to one degree or another yet retaining that certain poise of the originals. It has been a fun process trying to work out the original figures and I am tempted to say that much that may have been in the original catalogue may not now be there. I am lookng especially at the Gensdarmes above, although they have since turned up again as remastered figures in the Tradition Catalogue. The wheel turns again.
I would like to try my hand at this kind of thing at some time in the no too distant future. I just need to lay in a stock of lead foil and learn how to solder.
I was leafing through my old magazines over the weekend. What better way is there to pass the time these bitter cold winter nights, I ask you? Anyway, in between glasses of Shiraz, I came across these articles featuring the work of one Mr Alec Harrison of the BMSS in the March 1988 issue of Military Modelling and the inestimable Practical Wargamer of January/February 1994
His work is utterly charming in my eyes and has the advantages of using 30mm Willie figures, all converted to one degree or another yet retaining that certain poise of the originals. It has been a fun process trying to work out the original figures and I am tempted to say that much that may have been in the original catalogue may not now be there. I am lookng especially at the Gensdarmes above, although they have since turned up again as remastered figures in the Tradition Catalogue. The wheel turns again.
I would like to try my hand at this kind of thing at some time in the no too distant future. I just need to lay in a stock of lead foil and learn how to solder.
Sunday, June 21, 2015
Sunday, June 14, 2015
A Few of my Favorite Things
| Minots |
| Staddens |
They all seem to mix in quite well. A happy coincidence.
| Willies |
| Staddens |
And sometimes they are not like this Minot(?) Emperor at his work.
They also work well together.
Some are not quite so felicitous, but what the hey.
Unpainted ones I am happy to paint at my no pace. As I have no goals for this collection I am quite happy to potter about, take the Funckens and my Blandfords as references and simply enjoy the work of the master craftsmen who made these delightful miniatures.
Remember Majuba or; Up the Chamla with Old Buller
| African or Indian? |
Some more Willies ready to give Johnny Pathan one up the Chamla. not too sure as to whether they may join the "Littler Britons" collection or my broader colonial forces. They were at least an entertaining challenge to paint.
Thursday, June 04, 2015
Test Game
Well, I managed a small test of the rules this evening. I laid out three units of foot, one of horse and a gun per side, wavered and added another unit of foot to one army. And made it a guards unit. In for a penny, in for a pound.
The scenario involved an attack on a village. The weaker side was defending with two units and a gun lining a wall at the perimeter with the third staggered back a move outside to the flank but still in communication with the garrison. The cavalry were staggered further back again. The attackers came on, three units of foot abreast, the fourth tucked behind that on the right flank. Their cavalry faced that of the enemy although neither side really wanted to plunge in.
The attackers declared a charge after two moves of steady advance. Steady artillery fire had removed a pip from one of the enemy units in the village and it was this that the Guards (who were also a little depleted in their pip store) attacked, driving it back from the wall and electing to follow up with another round of melee which drove their opponents from the field. Their comrades had likewise been driven back, but had manfully rallied and cast their own opponents back out of the village.
The remaining units continued their advance until within musketry range, their generals joining them in order to prepare to bolster their pip store. One General lost a pip when his unit was fired on. The attackers had their fourth unit in close attendance on that which was to the fore should it need to fall back.
So, three moves played out in thirty minutes on the living room floor. Lessons learned? I think the defender ought to have a cover bonus when being fired on. Can't believe I missed it, really! Also, I think a defender ought to be able to shoot as a charge reaction. Evading as a charge reaction? I don't think so.
The rules seemed to work fairly well. I like the shooting rules, simple and fast moving. The melee was rather fun with some real ebb and flow. The Guards were tough, but now overwhelmingly so. I'd like to try a larger game with say six units of infantry per side to check the command and FBIGO rules.
So far so good.
ALSO - I thought it might be a good idea to put a copy of the rules on their own page. I'll just update that so the most current version is permanently up there.
Monday, June 01, 2015
The Age of Linear Warfare
I've been tinkering a little with a set of convention rules. The basic idea is to get out either the Prince August and Meisterzinn moulds and get casting.
Any comments would be welcome:
Any comments would be welcome:
The Age of Linear
Warfare
Notes
*Equipment: A
48” baton marked in 4” increments. A number of six-sided dice for the
adjudication of combat; a number of six sided mini-dice equal to the number of
units on the table and; one extra token to mark the extra pip Guards units may
have.
*Units, be
they Foot or Horse, have an 8” frontage. Figures are mounted on two 4” wide
wood strips. As many figures as are regarded as aesthetically pleasing may be
used.
*Every unit
gets a number of pips (generally six). When this store of pips has been
exhausted, the unit is considered destroyed.
Move
*Line
Infantry 8”
*Light
Infantry and Line Cavalry 12”
*Artillery 8”
Any unit may
expend a pip to gain a double move to charge. Charges must be declared at the
start of the turn.
Shoot
*Infantry – I
die per stand. Range 8”.
Cavalry do
not shoot.
*Artillery –
4 8” bands: Band 1 – 5 dice, Band 2 – 3 dice, Band3 – 2 dice, Band 4 – 1 die.
Procedure:
roll dice and pray for 4+. Every Hit thus obtained removes one ‘pip’ from the
defender’s store.
Melee
*Melee is
adjudicated with a simple opposed dice roll with modifiers as follows: +1 if
Guards, defending a linear obstacle, charging unto melee or if the pip difference between the attacker and defender is two or more "pips".
*Loss of the Melee results in a one-move push-back for the loser and the loss of one 'pip'. The victor may elect to follow up with another round of Melee with a +1 advantage on the dice roll. A subsequent second will result in the losing unit being destroyed regardless of remaining 'pips'. Draws result in a mutual push-back of a full move.
*Loss of the Melee results in a one-move push-back for the loser and the loss of one 'pip'. The victor may elect to follow up with another round of Melee with a +1 advantage on the dice roll. A subsequent second will result in the losing unit being destroyed regardless of remaining 'pips'. Draws result in a mutual push-back of a full move.
Morale
*Units down
to the last pip may perform no offensive action.
*When half
the army has been destroyed, the remainder must withdraw.
*A unit may
choose to Fall Back In Good Order. It retires a full move during the next move
Phase. Thenceforth, it may recover one pip per turn in which it may perform no
other actions.
*Guards units
may have an extra “seventh” pip. Light Infantry have four pips only.
*Generals.
Have two pips. They are not affected by morale rules. On joining a unit, they
will recover a pip for that unit. Any unit attacked whilst with a General attached must flip a coin to see which of them bears any pip loss.
EDIT - Melee Rules updated.
EDIT #2 - Melee rules updated again.
EDIT - Melee Rules updated.
EDIT #2 - Melee rules updated again.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





















